Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Life of Pedro Calungsod


We have 54 days to go towards the canonization of the 2nd Filipino saint, Pedro Calungsod. Knowing more about him will lead us to imitate him. He was a young man who lived and died for his faith. Here is an introduction to his life and his sacrifice.

Pedro Calungsod was a young native of the Visayas region of the Philippines. Very little is known about him. He was just one of the boy catechists who went with some Spanish Jesuit missionaries from the Philippines to the Ladrones Islands in the western Pacific in 1668 to evangelize the Chamorros.

Life in the Ladrones was hard. The provisions for the Mission did not arrive regularly; the jungles were too thick to cross; the cliffs were very stiff to climb, and the islands were frequently visited by devastating typhoons. Despite all these, the missionaries persevered, and the Mission was blessed with many conversions. Subsequently, the islands were renamed “Marianas” by the missionaries in honor of the Blessed Virgin Mary and of the Queen Regent of Spain, María Ana, who was the benefactress of that Mission.

But very soon, a Chinese quack, named Choco, envious of the prestige that the missionaries were gaining among the Chamorros, started to spread the talk that the baptismal water of the missionaries was poisonous. And since some sickly Chamorro infants who were baptized died, many believed the calumniator and eventually apostatized. The evil campaign of Choco was readily supported by the Macanjas (sorcerers) and the Urritaos (young male prostitutes) who, along with the apostates, began persecuting the missionaries.

The most unforgettable assault happened on 2 April 1672, the Saturday just before the Passion Sunday of that year. At around seven o’clock in the morning, Pedro—by then already about 17 years old—and the superior of the mission, named Padre Diego Luís de San Vitores, came to the village of Tomhom, in the Island of Guam. There, they were told that a baby girl was recently born in the village, so they went to ask the child’s father, named Matapang, to bring out the infant for baptism. Matapang was a Christian and a friend of the missionaries, but having apostatized, he angrily refused to have his baby baptized.

To give Matapang some time to cool down, Padre Diego and Pedro gathered the children and some adults of the village at the nearby shore and started chanting with them the truths of the Catholic Faith. They invited Matapang to join them, but the apostate shouted back that he was angry with God and was already fed up with the Christian teachings.

Determined to kill the missionaries, Matapang went away and tried to enlist in his cause another villager, named Hirao, who was not a Christian. At first, Hirao refused, mindful of the kindness of the missionaries towards the natives; but when Matapang branded him a coward, he got piqued and so he consented. Meanwhile, during that brief absence of Matapang from his hut, Padre Diego and Pedro took the chance of baptizing the infant, with the consent of the Christian mother.

When Matapang learned of the baptism, he became even more furious. He violently hurled spears first at Pedro. The lad skirted the darting spears with remarkable dexterity. The witnesses said that Pedro had all the chances to escape because he was very agile, but he did not want to leave Padre Diego alone. Those who knew Pedro personally believed that he would have defeated his fierce aggressors and would have freed both himself and Padre Diego if only he had some weapons because he was a very valiant boy; but Padre Diego never allowed his companions to carry arms. Finally, Pedro got hit by a spear at the chest and he fell to the ground. Hirao immediately charged towards him and finished him off with a blow of a cutlass on the head. Padre Diego gave Pedro the sacramental absolution. After that, the assassins also killed Padre Diego.

Matapang took the crucifix of Padre Diego and pounded it with a stone while blaspheming God. Then, both assassins denuded the bodies of Pedro and Padre Diego, dragged them to the edge of the shore, tied large stones to the feet of these, brought them on a proa to sea and threw them into the deep. Those remains of the martyrs were never to be found again.

When the companion missionaries of Pedro learned of his death, they exclaimed, “Fortunate youth! How well rewarded his four years of persevering service to God in the difficult Mission are: he has become the precursor of our superior, Padre Diego, in Heaven!” They remembered Pedro to be a boy with very good dispositions, a virtuous catechist, a faithful assistant, and a good Catholic whose perseverance in the Faith even to the point of martyrdom proved him to be a good soldier of Christ (cf. II Tim 2:3).

Padre Diego Luís de San Vitores was beatified in 1985. It was his beatification that brought the memory of Pedro Calungsod to our day. In 1994, then-Cebu Archbishop Ricardo Cardinal Vidal asked permission from the Vatican to initiate the beatification and canonization cause of Pedro Calungsod. In March 1997, the Sacred Congregation for the Causes of Saints approved the acta of the diocesan beatification process. That same year, Cardinal Vidal appointed Fr Ildebrando Leyson as vice-postulator for the cause, tasked with compiling a Positio Super Martyrio (position regarding the martyrdom) to be scrutinized by the Congregation. The positio, which relied heavily on the documentation of San Vitores' beatification, was completed in 1999.

 Blessed John Paul II, wanting to include young Asian laypersons in his first beatification for the Jubilee Year 2000, paid particular attention to the cause of Calungsod. In January 2000, he approved the decree super martyrio (concerning the martyrdom) of Calungsod, setting his beatification for 5 March 2000 at Saint Peter's Square in Rome.

Regarding Calungsod's charitable works and virtuous deeds, Pope John Paul II declared:
 
“… From his childhood, Pedro Calungsod declared himself unwaveringly for Christ and responded generously to his call. Young people today can draw encouragement and strength from the example of Pedro, who love for Jesus inspired him to devote his teenage years to teaching the faith as a lay catechist. Leaving family and friends behind, Pedro willingly accepted the challenge put to him by fr. Diego de San Vitores to jin him on the Mission the Chamorros. In a spirit of faith, marked by strong Eucharistic and Marian devotion, Pedro undertook the demanding work asked of him and bravely faced the many obstacles and difficulties he met. In the face of imminent danger, Pedro would not forsake Fr. Diego, but as a “good soldier of Christ” preferred to die at the missionary’s side.” (Homily of Pope John II, No. 5 Vatican, March 5, 2000)

Sources: Wikipedia; Commission on Worship, Archdiocese of Cebu. 
Video: courtesy of SalesianaFILMS-FIN

Monday, August 27, 2012

5 Reasons Why Jesse Robredo is a Great Loss


Sec. Jesse Robredo will be laid to rest in Naga City, his hometown, on August 28, 2012 (Tuesday). The overwhelming tribute and sense of loss for him showed that the country appreciates efficient governance and clean leadership. Veronica Uy of InterAksyon.com shares 5 Reasons why Jesse Robredo is a great loss.

  5 Reasons Why Jesse Robredo is a Great Loss 
(or 5 amazing things about him as a politician)

 The first title is a reminder to the powers-that-be that these five reasons are exactly the very same qualities that Jesse Robredo’s successor should possess. The second is an invocation, if not a cynic’s self-defense against disappointment, since it puts “amazing” and “politician” in one phrase.

1. He served the people.

And he served especially the least of them, the informal settlers. Despite his middle-class upbringing, Jesse Robredo did not blame the “squatters” for most of society’s ills: the crimes against property (or what Anti-Poverty Commission Undersecretary Jude Esguerra calls the Jean Valjean crimes), the trash, and the floods. He saw them as people trapped in a system that forced them to live as rats, in sewers and sewer-like conditions.
While one Cabinet member talked about “blasting” them away from the danger zones by creeks and waterways at the height of the habagat floodings, Robredo was meeting with them almost every day, hammering out the details of their immediate relocation within the city, following the P50-billion multi-year shelter program that he cobbled together with urban-poor groups and shelter-as-human-right advocates.

2. He shared power.

The nature of power is to amass more power. It is jealous and greedy. Robredo fought the nature of power—and won. How was he not devoured by the system? He invented a better one.
When he was first elected mayor of Naga City, he immediately institutionalized participative democracy, a difficult concept to actualize—even for activists who had used it in slogans and tried to give life to it in “collectives.” He established a system whereby the organized sectors (urban poor, women, labor, elderly, disabled, etc.) were given space in all aspects of governance—from brainstorming to implementation to monitoring to fine-tuning/correcting the plan. Unheard of in politics, especially in feudal Philippines.
While Bayani “BF” Fernando achieved practically the same things for Marikina City—a clean and healthy environment, efficiently delivered public and social services, and international awards, Robredo did not use an iron fist.

3. He was an activist—without claiming to be one.

He acted. He initiated. He made things happen. Solve traffic mess, check. Eliminate jueteng, check. Streamline bureaucracy, check. Plus a host of other things. He was a kindred spirit to many activists who chose to engage the government, find solutions to pressing problems, and make an impact on people’s lives—instead of simply finding fault. In his wholistic approach to governance, he minded that the means is also the end.

4. He is world-class.

His innovations are recognized by his people (those who benefited from his efforts) and by international bodies (those who want to replicate them). These are some of the awards—in a variety of categories—that Naga City received because of what Robredo started:

* Housing Rights Protector Award: Center for Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE), Geneva, Switzerland, City Government of Naga honoured with Housing Rights Protector Award for its exceptional commitment to the human right to adequate housing | December 5, 2007

* Cost Effective (City Category) in the search for Asian Cities and Regions of the Future (for year 2005-2006): Conferred by London-based Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Magazine London, United Kingdom

* Global 107 Best Practices, 2004 Dubai International Awards, i-Governance Program of Naga City (Best Practices in Improving the Living Environment): Conferred by the United Nations - Habitat and the Municipality of Dubai

* Recipient, United Nations Public Service Awards, Application of Information and Technology (ICT) in Local Government: Local eGovernment: Conferred by the United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), United Nations Public Service Day | June 23, 2004

* Recipient, Award for Women-Friendly City, Contest of Gender Responsive Local Government for Asia Pacific: Conferred by the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), Fukouka, Japan | March 8, 2004

* Recipient, CyberCity Award for Asia-Pacific, For Developing Effective & Efficient Model of Utilizing ICT for promoting good governance: Conferred by Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

* Finalist, World Habitat 2002, Naga Kaantabay sa Kauswagan Program:  Conferred by the Building and Social Foundation and UN-HABITAT, World Habitat Day | Brussels, Belgium

* Finalist, World Habitat 2001, Naga Kaantabay sa Kauswagan Program: Conferred by the United Nations Center for Housing Settlement (UNCHS)

* Acclaimed as one of the Most Improved Cities in Asia: Asiaweek Magazine, November 1999

* Awards Winner, Naga City Participatory Planning Initiatives, 1998 Dubai International Award for Best Practices in Improving the Living Environment,
Municipality of Dubai and the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN HABITAT), Municipality of Dubai, United Arab Emirates

* HABITAT II TOP 40 Best Practices, Naga Kaantabay sa Kauswagan Program:  United Nations Center for Human Settlements (UNCHS), Istanbul, Turkey

5. He is a good and great man.

A unique combination of these traits, he himself required it from those who would join government, only he called them matino at magaling. By all accounts, he was a happy worker. No job is too small for him to do, no dream too big for him to realize.

EPILOGUE

My first encounter with him was in late 2004 when I was doing research for an article on great cities for the local Good Housekeeping magazine. (I’d like to think his Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval to performing local government units was an idea he got from that piece.) Naturally, Naga City was on the list. I wasn’t able to interview him for the news feature, but was satisfied with the interviews of the empowered people of his government and his community.

So when I saw him later at the Senate several years back (Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was still president then), I approached him, introduced myself, and told him how that writing assignment turned me into a Robredo fan. He remembered the article and told me it was posted on the Naga City website. I told him what he did in Naga City must be replicated throughout the country, and that he needed a job with a national scope. That was my second encounter with him.

His death is a personal loss because he could’ve done much more.

I would have liked to see the results of his experiment at the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (Armm). I wonder how he would have navigated the intricate, long-standing issues that have kept Armm at the bottom of every governance test. My third encounter would be when I join the multitude of other Jesse’s girls and boys who have been inspired by his example, to pay our last respects to an amazing human being.

( Source: InterAksyon.com - The online news portal of TV5)
.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Faith-enlightened Choices


           Life is difficult because we have to make choices. Some choices are simple; others are complicated. Some are easy while others are difficult. There are choices which are even life-changing. Such is the case of today’s First Reading (Jos 24:15-18). We are familiar with the story of Joshua. He succeeded Moses and became the general of the Israelites. He became the leader who  brought them to the promised land. It was not easy. After so much fight and struggle, they finally settled in peace. All along God was with them – helping them and giving them victory. Every step of the journey God accompanied them. Now Joshua asks them to renew their loyalty and commitment to the Lord. He invited them to make a choice for God!

            Joshua is aware that soldiers get tired. They become afraid and abandon their pledge. He is asking them to choose to have faith in the God of Israel even when it is hard. He insists that they be faithful to the covenant and not turn away from Him in order to trust other neighboring gods. He himself makes a courageous example: “As for me and my household, we will serve the Lord!”

            It is important to make wise and enlightened choices. One modern-day Joshua is DILG Secretary Jesse Robredo. To flashback a little, when Ninoy Aquino was assassinated on August 21, 1968 (29 years ago), he was then a young man of 25. Incidentally, he was confirmed dead on the same date. Back then, he had a bright future ahead. He had an MBA degree from UP Diliman with a high paying, promising career at San Miguel Corporation. But when he lined up to see Ninoy’s bruised and blooded body gunned down as a martyr because he believed that “the Filipino is worth dying for,” he left the comfortable corporate world to dedicate his life to public service.

            He became the “idol” of the masses in Naga where he became Mayor for three consecutive terms. He sought to change things by fighting bravely corruption, vice, poverty and economic stagnation. He transformed Naga into a 1st class city by his transparency and integrity. In 2000, he was awarded the Ramon Magsaysay Award for exemplary Government Service. He was simple and humble. He walked his talked. When his term as Mayor ended in 1998, he stepped down quietly ignoring suggestions for him to seek higher office or perpetuate himself in power. At his death, he left a legacy of service. Many observed that he brought back honor and dignity to public office.

            In our Gospel (Jn 6:60-69), Jesus concludes his long discourse on identifying himself as the “Bread of Life.” His hearers are shocked and scandalized. “This is a hard saying!” And they stopped following him returning to their former way of life. The difficulty made them loose heart. But Peter gave an example of a decisive and determined faith: “Lord, to whom shall we go. You have the words of eternal life!”

            Through our Readings, Jesus is reminding us 3 things:
1.      Our choices must be attuned with God’s will.
Life is a constant struggle between good and evil; right and wrong. God presents us His standards. Thus we are to apply good sense, reason and logic to our choices. Most of all, our enlightened choices must be guided by faith. We choose how best to serve God, not ourselves.

2.      Right choices bring great happiness and peace.
Even today there are still teachings of Jesus which are hard to accept. Others simply want to choose which commandment are convenient to do. Other issues become sensitive and controversial such as laws on marriage, divorce or abortion. Yet we choose to serve God despite the difficulties. Remember these are commandments – God’s order! It is not a matter to our liking. The lines from the song “Impossible Dream” says (after choosing to do right): “and my heart will lie peaceful and calm / when I’m laid to my rest.”

3.      We are challenged to be a person of commitment.
Today, God is inviting us to review our basic commitment to love and serve Him. Right choices without commitment is vain. Our commitment must be in season or out of season. Like marriage, it should be rain or shine; in good times and in bad; through sickness or health. We are to commit and press on because we have great faith in Jesus whom we are following.
 
Let us pray for the grace of not getting tired of choosing God courageously.

Lourdes Shrine Fiesta - February 11

Lourdes Shrine Fiesta - February 11
Archdiocesan Shrine of Our Lady of Lourdes Parish

Installation as Parish Priest

Installation as Parish Priest
The Parish Priest with USC Elem Batchmates

After the Installation Rites

After the Installation Rites
Archbishop Jose Palma with Fr. Provincial, Family and Parishioners

Lourdes Parish Salesian Community 2016

Lourdes Parish Salesian Community 2016
L-R: Fr. Gino, Fr. Denden, Fr. Randy, Fr. Cesar and Fr. George